Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Aug 21.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Stat Assoc. 2012 Aug 21;107(500):1492–1501. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2012.721281

Table 3.

Average apparent and cross-validated (CV) estimates for the AUC using TInline graphic, Z information ( AUCt0,τ(2)) and Z information only ( AUCt0,τ(1)) with corresponding empirical SEs (ESE), average of the SE estimates from the perturbation-resampling method (ASE) for the apparent estimates and empirical coverage levels (Cvg) from setting (i), the low event rate setting and (ii), the moderate event rate setting. All entries are multiplied by 100.

(i) low event rate setting

n=2000

Apparent CV (3-fold)

Average ESE ASE Average ESE Cvg

AUCt0,τ(2)
90.0 0.9 1.0 89.3 1.0 91.5
AUCt0,τ(1)
88.2 1.0 1.0 88.2 1.0 93.8

n=5000

Apparent CV (3-fold)

Average ESE ASE Average ESE Cvg

AUCt0,τ(2)
90.0 0.6 0.6 89.6 0.6 93.8
AUCt0,τ(1)
88.3 0.6 0.6 88.3 0.6 94.7

(ii) moderate event rate setting

n=2000

Apparent CV (3-fold)

Average ESE ASE Average ESE Cvg

AUCt0,τ(2)
92.0 0.7 0.8 91.2 0.8 92.6
AUCt0,τ(1)
85.2 1.0 1.0 85.2 1.0 95.2

n=5000

Apparent CV (3-fold)

Average ESE ASE Average ESE Cvg

AUCt0,τ(2)
91.8 0.4 0.5 91.5 0.5 94.0
AUCt0,τ(1)
85.3 0.6 0.6 85.3 0.6 95.9