Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 3.
Published in final edited form as: Lupus. 2011 Oct 26;21(5):563–569. doi: 10.1177/0961203311426154

Table 4.

Linear regression models for the association between SLE diagnosis and PCS and MCS before and after adjusting for potential confounders

Model Variable PCS p MCS p
1 Overall model <0.01 0.70
SLE −10.4 <0.01 −1.0 0.70
2 Overall model <0.01 0.99
SLE −4.1 0.07 −1.8 0.59
Age (per 1 year) 0.0 0.99 0.83
Currently working 4.5 0.07 0.3 0.93
Disabled −9.8 <0.01 0.6 0.87
Years of education (per 1 year) −0.1 0.73 0.4 0.49
Has medical insurance −1.4 0.67 1.8 0.72
Hypertension −3.5 0.10 0.8 0.79
History of depression −0.9 0.70 −0.4 0.91
3 Overall model 0.03 0.98
SLE −4.8 0.04 −1.1 0.72
Age (per 1 year) 0.0 0.77 0.0 0.91
Currently working 3.9 0.13 1.0 0.77
Years of education (per 1 year) 0.2 0.70 0.2 0.71
Has medical insurance 1.0 0.79 3.3 0.49
Hypertension −6.5 0.03 −2.5 0.54
History of depression 6.5 0.04 2.2 0.63

The difference in PCS and MCS and the p-value for the Wald test are presented for each variable, plus the overall model significance. Model 3 is restricted to those who are not disabled.