Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Liver Transpl. 2013 Jan;19(1):59–68. doi: 10.1002/lt.23547

Table 5.

Percentagea of overall liver graft non-use due to donor characteristics in 2010

Characteristic % of non-useb (95% CI)
Age
 < 30 [Ref]
 30–39 3.7 (2.3–5.1)
 40–49 11.6 (9.7–13.6)
 50–59 15.3 (13.2–17.2)
 ≥ 60 7.6 (6.2–9.0)
Female 3.0 (1.5–4.5)
Race
 White 16.8 (13.3–20.3)
 Black [Ref]
 Other 7.8 (6.7–8.8)
Body mass index
 < 18.5 0.3 (0.1–0.6)
 18.5–24+ [Ref]
 25–29+ 2.7 (1.3–4.1)
 30–39+ 10.7 (9.4–11.9)
 ≥ 40 4.2 (3.7–4.7)
Diabetes 1.0 (0.2–1.7)
DCD 28.4 (27.0–29.8)
Cause of death
 Trauma [Ref]
 CVA 3.5 (1.5–5.4)
Alcohol use 10.9 (10.0–11.9)
Inotrope support 2.4 (0.5–4.2)
ALT, U/L
 ≤ 40 [Ref]
 41–200 11.0 (9.6–12.4)
 201–400 2.9 (2.4–3.3)
 > 400 6.0 (5.5–6.4)
Bilirubin, mg/dL
 ≤ 1.2 [Ref]
 1.3–2.5 4.3 (3.5–5.1)
 2.6–5 2.9 (2.5–3.3)
 > 5 2.6 (2.3–2.9)
Hepatitis C antibody 2.3 (2.0–2.7)

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; DCD, donation after cardiac death; CVA, cerebrovascular accident; ALT, alanine aminotransferase.

a

Calculated as the population attributable risk proportion, based on the multivariate logistic regression model.

b

Percentages do not sum to 100% because population attributable risk proportions are not independent.