Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Hum Genet. 2012 Nov 6;77(1):9–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.2012.00736.x

Table 4.

Logistic regression results for haplogroup defining mtDNA SNPs analysed in Phase 2

SNP Basepair position Minor Allele **MAF P-value OR L95 U95
*MitoA1719G 1719 G 0.04 0.44 1.18 0.78 1.79
MitoC4216T 4216 T 0.17 0.58 1.07 0.85 1.34
MitoA4580G 4580 G 0.04 0.79 0.94 0.58 1.52
*MitoG4917A 4917 A 0.09 0.34 0.86 0.63 1.17
MitoC7028T 7028 T 0.39 0.30 0.83 0.58 1.18
MitoA8251G 8251 G 0.04 0.73 1.08 0.71 1.63
MitoA9055G 9055 G 0.09 0.93 0.99 0.73 1.33
*MitoG10398A 10398 A 0.26 0.31 1.12 0.90 1.41
*MitoG12308A 12308 A 0.22 0.99 1.00 0.78 1.27
MitoA13368G 13368 G 0.1 0.66 0.94 0.69 1.26
MitoA13708G 13708 G 0.09 0.09 1.28 0.97 1.71
*MitoA16391G 16391 G 0.02 0.68 1.13 0.63 2.03
*

These 5 SNPs were also genotyped in Phase 1

**

Minor allele frequency in controls

OR, odds ratio; L95/U95, lower and upper bounds of the 95% confidence interval for the OR