Table 3.
Factors by which the LT Rates are Lower in Women than Men, Controlling for other Variables Using Pooled Logistic Regression
Variables Controlled For | Female/Male Transplant Odds Ratio on the Liver Transplant Waiting List | P Value |
---|---|---|
Gender + UNOS Region + Blood Type | 0.75 | <0.0001 |
Gender + UNOS Region + Blood Type + MELD | 0.84 | <0.0001 |
Gender + UNOS Region + Blood Type + MELD + eLV1 | 0.87 | <0.0001 |
Gender + UNOS Region + Blood Type + MELD + eLW2 | 0.86 | <0.0001 |
Gender + UNOS Region + Blood Type + MELD + eLW3 | 0.86 | <0.0001 |
Gender + UNOS Region + Blood Type + MELD + eLV4 | 0.87 | <0.0001 |
Gender + UNOS Region + Blood Type + MELD + eLV5 | 0.86 | <0.0001 |
Gender + UNOS Region + Blood Type + MELD + eLW6 | 0.87 | <0.0001 |
eLV based on Formula Developed by Urata et al. 12 (ml)
eLW based on Formula Developed by Yoshimuzi et al.15 (g)
eLW based on Formula Developed by Chouker et al. 16 (g)
eLV based on Formula Developed by Heinemann et al. 14 (ml)
eLV based on Formula Developed by Vauthey et al. 13 (ml)
eLW based on Formula Developed by DeLand et al. 17 (kg)