Table 2.
Effect of Gender on EOMG Associations
| gendera | locus | marker | ORb | OR 95% CI | p-value | gender pc |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | PTPN22 | rs2476601 | 1.72 | 1.42 – 2.10 | 6.02E-08 | 0.93 |
| Male | 1.71 | 1.16 – 2.51 | 6.46E-03 | |||
|
| ||||||
| Female | TNIP1 | rs4958881 | 1.73 | 1.42 – 2.12 | 6.77E-08 | 0.76 |
| Male | 1.80 | 1.23 – 2.62 | 2.50E-03 | |||
|
| ||||||
| Female | MHC | HLA_B*08 | 6.92 | 4.28 – 5.91 | 8.48E-96 | <0.0001 |
| Male | 3.55 | 2.46 – 4.56 | 1.89E-13 | |||
The number of female cases was 538 and the number of male cases was 111. The female and male analyses were matched 3:1 and 8:1with controls, respectively. All analyses were controlled for population substructure as in the main analyses.
OR, odds ratio.
The p-valuefor gender difference was calculated using an unpaired T test.