Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2012 Oct 30;54:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2012.10.010

Table 2.

Variables of myosin enzyme kinetics model applied to myosin detachment rate 2πc vs MgATP relationships (Equation 3).

WKY (n=4) 100% α WKYPTU (4) 100% β SvEv (7) 100% α SvEvPTU (6) 100% β FVB (8) 100% α FVBβTG (4) 70% β-30% α predicted100% β
k−ADP (s−1) 65.0±7.9 15.5±0.8* 111.4±6.2 24.3±1.8 115.1±5.1 48.9±3.1 20.5
k+ATP (mM−1.s−1) 108±10 55±6* 325±32 152±23 338±41 212±31* 158
t−ADP (ms) 18.2±1.9 64.9±3.3 9.1±0.4 42.3±2.9 9.3±0.4 21.3±1.6 26.4 (48.7)
[MgATP]50 (μM) 579±66 334±14* 365±43 178±25 394±49 271±31# 218

Mean time period of MgADP state, t−ADP = 1/ k−ADP, and MgATP concentration at half maximum detachment rate, [MgATP]50 = k−ADP/k+ATP, are also provided.

P<0.01,

*

P<0.05,

#

P<0.1 against 100% α-MyHC controls. Predicted values for 100% β-MyHC in the FVB strain were calculated as (FVBβTG – 0.3 × FVB) / 0.7; an alternative value for the predicted t−ADP, given in parentheses, is the reciprocal of the predicted k−ADP.