Skip to main content
. 2001 Jul 16;1:7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-1-7

Table 1.

Categorical arrangements for the different cell types in 160 rectal cancer patients.

cell type (antibody) intratumoral peritumoral
cells / mm2 % of patients cells / mm2 % of patients
eosinophils (EG-2) n = 159 n = 140
none/few 0-10 29 0-50 31
moderate 11-50 50 51 - 200 43
many > 50 21 > 200 26

neutrophils (elastase) n = 160 n = 152
none/few 0-5 21 0 - 75 24
moderate 6 - 50 54
many > 50 25 > 75 76

mast cells (tryptase) n= 160 n = 151
none/few 0 -5 19 0-30 25
moderate 6 -50 52 31 -100 59
many > 50 29 > 100 16

macrophages (CD68) n = 159
none/few 0-50 28
moderate 51 -150 50
many > 150 22

NK cells (CD56) n = 159 n = 136
none 0 33 0 43
moderate/many > 0 67 > 0 57

T cells (CD3) n = 158 n = 157
none/few 0-55 27 0-300 20
moderate 56-105 36 301 - 500 51
many >105 37 > 500 29

CD4+ cells n = 156 n = 130
none/few 0-30 43 0-20 24
moderate 31 -65 26 21 -110 50
many >65 31 > 110 26

CD8+ cells n = 159 n = 122
none/few 0-15 26 0-135 77
moderate 16-75 47
many >75 27 > 135 23

Peritumoral infiltrate could not be reliably determined in all patients, because of the absence of invasive front in several tumor samples.