Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan;79(1):381–384. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02626-12

Table 1.

Swab extraction and recovery efficiency in the swabbing trialsa

Type of swabd Swab description Swab extraction efficiencyg
Recovery efficiency per sampling spotg
CFU (106) %b CFU (106) %c
HM-foame 20-mm rough bud; thin solid plastic handle 9.5 ± 1.48A 86.2 ± 13.38A 2.33 ± 0.39D 22.8 ± 3.9D
HM-nylone 20-mm medium soft bud; thin solid plastic handle 8.9 ± 7.66B 80.5 ± 6.94B 4.53 ± 0.93C 45.0 ± 9.3C
HM-polyestere 15-mm medium-soft bud; tubular PP handle 10.5 ± 1.16A 94.7 ± 10.56A 5.06 ± 0.91B 50.2 ± 9.1B
HM-cottone 12-mm firm cotton bud; solid wooden handle 6.1 ± 0.80C 54.9 ± 7.23C 5.70 ± 0.96B 56.6 ± 9.6B
Johnson's budf 15-mm medium-soft cotton bud; tubular PP handle 8.1 ± 1.21B 73.9 ± 10.94B 6.96 ± 1.29A 64.1 ± 12.9A
Tulips budf 15-mm soft cotton bud; tubular PP handle 9.1 ± 0.71A,B 82.8 ± 6.45A 7.06 ± 0.76A 70.6 ± 7.6A
a

Different swabs used in the swabbing trials and the assessment of extraction efficiency of directly applied spores on the swab head and the recovery efficiency of Bacillus subtilis spores from inoculum-seeded 5-cm-diameter spots on a stainless steel laminar airflow workbench.

b

Based on a seeded inoculum of 11.05 ± 0.54 × 106 CFU per swab; six replications.

c

Based on a seeded inoculum of 10.07 ± 1.57 × 106 CFU per spot; six replications.

d

HM, Hi-Media source.

e

Presterilized and individually packed.

f

To be autoclaved.

g

Significant at P = 0.001. Values followed by the same letter are not significantly different.