Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 3.
Published in final edited form as: Assessment. 2009 Feb 20;16(2):127–144. doi: 10.1177/1073191108330065

Table 2.

Correlations and Validity Estimates for Questionnaire Indicators

Correlations: Full Sample (Taxon/Complement)
#1/2/7/9 #3 #5 #6
Symptom #3 .34 (.27/.22)
Symptom #5 .58 (.41/.53) .28 (.21/.21)
Symptom #6 .64 (.48/.53) .32 (.21/.24) .46 (.30/.37)
Symptom #8 .55 (.42/.46) .23 (.15/.15) .44 (.26/.39) .49 (.40/.38)
Validity Estimates
#1/2/7/9 #3 #5 #6 #8
Taxon M 0.97 0.45 0.59 0.79 0.59
Taxon SD 0.94 1.26 0.86 0.96 0.95
Complement M −0.35 −0.16 −0.22 −0.29 −0.22
Complement SD 0.76 0.83 0.96 0.85 0.93
Validity (d) 1.63 0.63 0.87 1.22 0.87
Skew 0.88 1.85 0.05 0.51 0.30

Note: MDD = major depressive disorder. N = 1,500; taxon n = 400 MDD+; complement n = 1,100 MDD−. All indicators have been standardized. Symptom numbers refer to DSM-IV criteria for MDD. Indicator validity is expressed as Cohen’s d, the mean difference between the taxon and complement standardized using pooled within-groups variances (weighted by df).