Table 7.
Status of family-planning methods used by female and male street-dwellers
| Use of familyplanning methods |
Females |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Model 1 |
Model 2 |
|||||
|
Baseline |
Endline |
% of difference |
Baseline |
Endline |
% of difference |
|
| (n = 194) No. (%) | (n = 188) No. (%) | (n = 190) No. (%) | (n = 190) No. (%) | |||
| Used methods |
68 (35) |
126 (67)** |
32 |
34 (18) |
89 (47) ** |
29 |
| Type of method used | ||||||
| Temporary |
20 (30) |
29 (23) |
7 |
17 (51) |
43 (48) |
3 |
| Semi-permanent |
38 (55) |
76 (60) |
5 |
8 (23) |
31 (36) |
13 |
| Permanent |
8 (12) |
17 (14) |
2 |
6 (17) |
11 (12) |
-5 |
| Traditional |
2 (3) |
4 (3) |
0 |
3 (9) |
4 (4) |
5 |
| |
Males |
|||||
|
Model 1 |
Model 2 |
|||||
| |
Baseline (n = 167) No. (%) |
Endline (n = 176) No. (%) |
% of difference |
Baseline (n = 165) No. (%) |
Endline (n = 76) No. (%) |
% of difference |
| Used methods |
55 (33) |
136 (77)** |
44 |
50 (30) |
31 (41) |
11 |
| Type of method used | ||||||
| Temporary |
29 (52) |
73 (54) |
2 |
24(48) |
13 (41) |
7 |
| Semi-permanent |
22 (41) |
53 (39) |
-2 |
16 (32) |
15 (47) |
15 |
| Permanent |
4 (7) |
10 (7) |
0 |
10 (20) |
3 (12) |
-8 |
| Traditional | 0 | 0 | 1(2) | 0 | ||
**p < 0.001.