Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 22;12:177. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-177

Table 3.

Comparison of the demographic profile of the mobile frame and the landline frame respondents

Demographic group Mobile frame
Landline frame
Mobile only (%) p-value Both (%) p-value Total (%) p-value Land-line only (%) Both (%) Total (%)
Age groups
0-15
8.5
<0.001
12.3
<0.001
11.4
<0.001
6.0
15.8
14.1
16-24
17.1
10.8
12.4
0.5
4.9
4.1
25-34
41.8
16.6
23.1
1.6
6.4
5.6
35-44
12.3
16.0
15.0
5.2
8.0
7.6
45-54
10.1
19.3
16.9
7.3
14.3
13.0
55-64
7.3
14.9
12.9
16.8
22.6
21.6
65-74
2.5
7.9
6.5
23.3
17.3
18.4
75-high
0.3
2.2
1.7
39.3
10.6
15.6
Sex
Male
48.4
0.049
48.3
0.052
48.4
0.052
42.9
38.0
38.9
Female
51.6
51.7
51.6
57.1
62.0
61.1
Aboriginality
Aboriginal
5.1
0.049
1.8
0.76
2.6
0.78
2.4
2.2
2.2
Non-Aboriginal
94.9
98.2
97.4
97.6
97.8
97.8
Country of birth
Australia
60.8
<0.001
79.4
1.00
64.9
<0.001
76.6
80.1
79.4
Overseas
39.2
20.6
35.1
23.4
19.9
20.6
Marital status
Married
31.3
<0.001
61.8
0.003
54.0
<0.001
45.3
56.0
54.1
Widowed
1.9
3.5
3.1
28.7
10.5
13.7
Separated
3.5
3.2
3.3
3.4
4.1
4.0
Divorced
7.4
7.0
7.1
10.8
12.6
12.3
Never married
55.8
24.5
32.5
11.8
16.8
15.9
Income < $20,000
19.0
0.32 9.9
0.001 12.0
0.01 46.8
19.7
24.0
$20,001-$40,000
14.7
15.7
15.4
24.5
18.9
19.8
$40,001-$60,000
16.8
14.3
14.9
9.3
16.2
15.1
$60,001-$80,000
14.2
13.9
14.0
4.1
11.5
10.4
$80,000 plus 35.3 46.3 43.7 15.2 33.7 30.8

Notes: Chi-squared testing, setting the significance level of p<0.05, was used for the comparisons between the mobile phone frame (mobile-only, both and total) sample demographic categories and the total landline frame sample.