. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 4.

Published in final edited form as: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Mar 26;38(5):1274–1295. doi: 10.1037/a0027626

Table 3.

Results of the Object Relatedness × Display Type × Context Interaction Model on the Fixation Data From the Competition Window

Term	Model fit			Specific vs. general context: competitor–unrelated
	Model fit			General function			Specific function			Thematic
	LL	χ²	p	Estimate	t	p	Estimate	t	p	Estimate	t	p
Intercept	4,527	2.85	.24	−0.012	−0.62	.53	−0.022	−1.37	.17	0.008	0.34	.73
Linear	4,528	1.73	.42	0.064	0.84	.40	−0.073	−1.07	.28	−0.010	−0.13	.90
Quadratic	4,529	2.37	.30	0.051	2.10	<.05	0.031	1.21	.22	−0.003	−0.12	.90
Cubic	4,541	24.29	<.0001	−0.070	−2.91	<.01	0.096	3.73	<.001	−0.034	−1.34	.18
Quartic	4,541	0.28	.87	0.001	0.06	.95	0.020	0.77	.44	0.013	0.53	.59

Note. The table provides the test of the overall interaction (model fit) as well as the test of the specific comparisons between the two contexts for the general function (left), specific function (middle), and thematic (right) displays for each term of the model (intercept, linear, quadratic, cubic, and quartic). Results in boldface are presented in the text. LL = log-likelihood.