Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 15;12:115. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-12-115

Table 1.

Student perceptions of the University of Ottawa professionalism program effectiveness by year of study

Question asked: the following are effective components of the professionalism program:   Year1 (n = 74) Year2 (n = 87) Year3 (n = 36) Year4 (n = 58) Total (n = 255) P-value
Clinical interactions
Disagree
4.1%
10.3%
8.3%
6.9%
7.5%
0.501
Agree
95.9%
89.7%
91.7%
93.1%
92.5%
 
Case scenario sessions *
Disagree
5.4%
21.8%
19.4%
22.4%
16.9%
0.019
Agree
94.6%
78.2%
80.6%
77.6%
83.1%
 
The formal professionalism course
Disagree
14.9%
27.6%
22.2%
22.4%
22.0%
0.285
Agree
85.1%
72.4%
77.8%
77.6%
78.0%
 
Orientation week
Disagree
24.3%
35.6%
30.6%
32.8%
31.0%
0.475
Agree
75.7%
64.4%
69.4%
67.2%
69.0%
 
Presentations *
Disagree
20.3%
34.5%
44.4%
32.8%
31.4%
0.057
Agree
79.7%
65.5%
55.6%
67.2%
68.6%
 
Evaluations of professionalism *
Disagree
23.0%
63.2%
55.6%
36.2%
44.3%
<.001
  Agree 77.0% 36.8% 44.4% 63.8% 55.7%  

(*Differences by year are significant at p < .05).