Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 1;3(1):101–108. doi: 10.1534/g3.112.004499

Table 1. Comparison of regions of segregation distortion between S. bicolor (SB) × S. propinquum (SP) F5 RIL and F2 populations.

F5
F2
Chr. Marker cM SB:SP Location, Mb Marker SB:SP LG Location, Mb
1 Xcup24 35.8 154:3 14.0 pSB195 203:15 C 14.2
2 CA154181a 50.6 129:24 58.3 pSB101 34:74 B 61.6
2 None near pSB075 111:35 B 66.1
3 CA199661a 11.2 101:40 0.2 None near A
3 CA074959aa 35.0 100:23 3.5- 6.2 N.D. A
3 TC48056aa 66.1 86:43 13.8-51.2 N.D. A
3 Xcup65 84.3 85:39 55.9 N.D. A
3 None near pSB443b 128:66 A 69.0
4 Xtxp265 77.2 117:37 64.9 None near F
4 N.D. pSB038 34:101 F 14.2
5 mSbCIR329 0.0 134:26 0.2 None near H
5 N.D. pSB064 33:81 H 6.5
5 Xisep1140 60.3 97:52 54.8 N.D. H
6 Xgap72 0.0 151:3 41.4 pSB095 104:60 D 50.7
6 None near pSB428a 93:41 D 38.0
6 None near pSB643a 65:20 D 4.3
7 N.D. pSB784 19:50 J 5.9
8 mSbCIR240 39.5 109:49 4.5 N.D. E
9 CA142735a 26.5 115:46 31.7 N.D. G
9 TC59518ba 37.7 105:55 50.2-54.5 N.D. G
10 Xcup43 88.7 123:26 59.8 pSB115 124:59 I 60.6

N.D., no distortion (not significantly different from 1:1 segregation); RIL, recombinant inbred line; LG, linkage group.

a

Physical location not on the corresponding chromosome of the linkage group: apices are estimated by adjacent marker locations.