Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul;87(7):643–651. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.02.024

TABLE 2.

Results of LAMP

Reference, year Reference Standard No. of studies Sensitivity Specificity Notes
Kato et al,38 2005 Cytotoxicity assay 74 0.97 0.71 Authors attribute high false-positive rate to superiority of LAMP, eg, more sensitive than cytotoxicity assay
Lalande et al,39 2011 Toxigenic culture 472 0.92 0.99 Study indicates LAMP to be more sensitive than cytotoxicity assay, to which it was compared
Doing and Hintz,37 2012 Agreement with ProGastro PCR test 446 0.98 0.99 Cases without agreement tested with cytotoxicity assay
Boyanton et al,35 2012 Agreement between 4 different molecular tests for CDI 139 0.95 0.97 Unresolved cases tested with toxigenic culture
Norén et al,40 2011 Toxigenic culture 272 0.98 0.98
Ota and McGowan,36 2012 Cytotoxicity assay 141 0.89 0.98 LAMP tests were performed as part of a 2-step glutamate dehydrogenase assay

LAMP = loop-mediated isothermal amplification; PCR = polymerase chain reaction.