Table 3.
Logistic regression analysis of determinants of VCT utilization among urban men in Ethiopia, 2005
| Variables |
Ever been tested for HIV |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Univariate OR(95% CI)♣ | Model 1 OR(95% CI)* | Model 2 OR(95% CI)** | Full Model OR(95% CI)*** | |
|
Age |
|
|
|
|
| 15–24 |
1.4 (0.76–2.52) |
1.2 (0.56–2.70) |
1.8 (0.88–3.61) |
1.7 (0.78–3.59) |
| 25–34 |
1.9 (1.07–3.36) |
1.6 (0.87–2.86) |
1.6 (0.91–2.73) |
1.5 (0.81–2.66) |
| 35–44 |
1.3 (0.73–2.33) |
1.2 (0.66–2.09) |
1.2 (0.66–2.07) |
1.1 (0.60–2.07) |
| 45–59 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Marital status |
|
|
|
|
| Never married |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
| Ever Married |
0.8 (0.55–1.26) |
0.7 (0.40–1.41) |
0.6 (0.33–1.25) |
0.7 (0.34–1.28) |
|
Socio-economic position |
|
|
|
|
| Lower |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
| Middle |
1.7 (0.61–4.92) |
1.5 (0.55–4.09) |
1.5 (0.54–4.24) |
1.4 (0.51–3.72) |
| Higher |
3.3 (1.27–8.72) |
2.7 (0.99–7.21) |
2.4 (0.82–6.78) |
2.2 (0.82–5.94) |
|
Religion |
|
|
|
|
| Christian |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
| Muslim |
0.5 (0.35–0.87) |
0.6 (0.34–0.86) |
0.6 (0.39–0.91) |
0.6 (0.40–0.97) |
|
HIV/AIDS-related knowledge index |
|
|
|
|
| Low |
1 |
|
1 |
1 |
| High |
0.6 (0.28–1.42) |
|
0.5 (0.26–1.15) |
0.5 (0.24–1.04) |
| Comprehensive knowledge |
1.0 (0.50–2.14) |
|
0.9 (0.43–1.70) |
0.7 (0.40–1.33) |
|
Risky sexual behaviour index |
|
|
|
|
| No risk |
1 |
|
1 |
1 |
| Some risk |
1.6 (0.99–2.49) |
|
2.1 (1.28–3.53) |
2.1 (1.31–3.42) |
| High risk |
2.9 (1.56–5.27) |
|
3.1(1.71–5.51) |
3.0 (1.68–5.51) |
|
HIV/AIDS-related stigma index |
|
|
|
|
| No stigma |
6.6 (1.93–22.94) |
|
|
3.6 (1.04–12.46) |
| Low |
3.7 (1.09–12.31) |
|
|
1.9 (0.56–6.67) |
| Moderate |
2.8 (0.72–9.94) |
|
|
1.6 (0.44–6.12) |
| High | 1 | 1 | ||
Keys: ♣= unadjusted odds ratio, * = only for socio-demographic variables, ** = for socio-demographic variables, knowledge, and risky sexual behaviour, *** = all variables in the model.