Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun 8;2012(1):17. doi: 10.1186/1687-9856-2012-17

Table 4.

Comparison of Testicular Volumes (ml) Obtained by Ultrasound in Normal Children and Adults at different ages Reported by 3 Groups with Volumes in Our Study Subjects Obtained Clinically (means ± SD)

Age group Osemlak[6] Goede et al.[7] Bahk et al.[22]
(W x H x L x 0.52)
Our study subjects
(W-ss)3 x 0.64
p value
Osemlak to
Our
p value
Goede et al.
To Our
p value
Bahk et al.
To Our
5 years
(17) 0.67 ± 0.19
(48) 0.58 ± 0.15
 
(24) 0.46 ± 0.07
<0.001
<0.001
 
7 years
(17) 0.68 ± 0.21
(62) 0.65 ± 0.17
 
(22) 0.56 ± 0.09
<0.05
<0.01
 
9 years
(17) 0.85 ± 0.31
(53) 0.79 ± 0.46
 
(36) 0.65 ± 0.19
<0.02
>0.05
 
12 years
(17) 3.29 ± 2.99
(55) 2.33 ± 1.77
 
(50) 2.56 ± 1.24
>0.1
>0.05
 
13 years
(18) 5.37 ± 2.92
(47) 4.42 ± 2.66
 
(18) 4.28 ± 0.96
>0.1
>0.05
 
15 years
(17) 8.71 ± 2.52
(26) 8.69 ± 2.91
 
(58) 8.01 ± 2.58
>0.1
>0.1
 
17 years
(17) 12.83 ± 3.94
(27) 12.12 ± 2.8
 
(36) 12.45 ± 1.99
>0.5
>0.5
 
18 years
 
(23) 13.73 ± 3.51
 
(56) 13.16 ± 2.67
 
>0.1
 
Adults
 
 
(1139)*13.29 ± 2.82
(102) 13.12 ± 3.17
 
 
>0.1
      (W x H x L x 0.71)
18.37 ± 3.62
((W-ss)3 x 0.88)
(102) 18.05 ± 4.36
    >0.1

Legend: (#) Number of observations.

The equation used by Osemlak and Goede et al. was W x H x L x 0.52 and our formula (W-ss)3 x 0.64.

* Calculated from the values using 0.71 as a constant.