Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 7;8(1):e53112. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053112

Table 1. Comparison of the missing peak rate of the fixed number-based method (Inline graphic) and the Benjamini-Hochberg (B-H) algorithm with Inline graphic on the 32 spectra of the eight proteins in the benchmark dataset as picked by WaVPeak.

Spectra 15N-HSQC HNCO HNCA HNCACB CBCA(CO)NH
Protein Len tNp B-H (d) tNp B-H (d) tNp B-H (d) tNp B-H (d) tNp B-H (d)
RP3384 64 7 7 (0) 0 0 (0) 12 12 (0) 8 8 (0)
CASKIN 67 6 2 (67) 22 15 (32) 38 41 (−8) 10 10 (0)
VRAR 72 3 3 (0) 7 7 (0) 31 32 (−3) 18 18 (0)
HACS1 74 7 2 (71) 8 6 (25) 14 15 (−7) 8 6 (25)
TM1112 89 8 2 (75) 6 6 (0) 8 7 (13) 9 2 (78)
COILIN 98 3 0 (100) 16 17 (−6) 24 25 (−4) 28 20 (29)
ATC1776 101 7 5 (29) 8 7 (13) 19 17 (11) 25 24 (4)
YST0336 146 2 2 (0) 6 3 (50) 11 10 (9) 17 13 (24)
Average 5.4 2.9 (43) 9.6 7.9 (16) 12 11.2 (5) 23 24 (−2) 15.4 12.6 (20)
SDave 2.2 2.0 6.7 5.7 4.6 3.9 10.9 12.0 7.4 7.0
Preave 84 77 77 73 83 76 64 71 72 67

Column Inline graphic is the relative improvement of the missing peak rate of B-H over Inline graphic. All values except the last two rows are the missing peak rates. The “Inline graphic” row lists the standard deviations of the missing peak rates for the corresponding columns, demonstrating the robustness of different methods. The last row is the average precision value. All values are given in percentage.