Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 7;8(1):e53112. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053112

Table 2. Comparison of the missing peak rate of the fixed number-based method (Inline graphic) and the Benjamini-Hochberg (B–H) algorithm with Inline graphic on the 32 spectra of the eight proteins in the benchmark set picked by PICKY.

Spectra 15N-HSQC HNCO HNCA HNCACB CBCA(CO)NH
Protein tNp B-H (d) tNp B-H (d) tNp B-H (d) tNp B-H (d) tNp B-H (d)
RP3384 6 4 (33) 0 0 (0) 13 13 (0) 36 10 (72)
CASKIN 2 2 (0) 22 15 (32) 33 38 (−15) 10 9 (10)
VRAR 7 7 (0) 9 9 (0) 31 31 (0) 19 19 (0)
HACS1 5 2 (60) 6 4 (33) 18 17 (6) 9 6 (33)
TM1112 8 1 (88) 6 6 (0) 8 7 (13) 9 2 (78)
COILIN 4 0 (100) 19 3 (84) 24 24 (0) 33 20 (39)
ATC1776 5 4 (20) 8 5 (38) 19 18 (5) 28 26 (7)
YST0336 2 2 (0) 6 3 (50) 12 10 (17) 17 12 (29)
Average 4.9 2.7 (38) 10.0 5.6 (34) 12.5 11.7 (6) 22.8 23.4 (1) 20.1 13.0 (34)
SDave 2.0 2.0 7.2 4.6 4.6 4.4 9.1 10.8 10.3 7.5
Preave 85 69 77 67 83 70 65 69 68 60

Column Inline graphic is the relative improvement of the missing peak rate of B-H over Inline graphic. All values except the last two rows are the missing peak rates. The “Inline graphic” row lists the standard deviations of the missing peak rates for the corresponding columns, which demonstrates the robustness of different methods. The last row gives the average precision values. All values are given in percentage.