Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 8;137(2):457–464. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-2341-9

Table 3.

Efficacy results (ITT population)

Characteristic Lapatinib + nab-paclitaxel (n = 60)
Overall response rate (ORR)
 Response rate (CR + PR), n (%) (95 % CI) 32 (53) (40.7–66.0)
 Best response, n (%)
  CR 4 (7)
  PR 28 (47)
  SD 10 (17)
  PD 8 (13)
  Unknown 10 (17)a
PFS
 Patients, n (%) 60 (100)
  Progressed or died due to any cause 30 (50)
  Censored, follow-up ended 19 (32)
  Censored, follow-up ongoing 11 (18)b
 Kaplan–Meier estimate for PFS (weeks)
  Median (95 % CI) 39.7 (34.1–63.9)
TTR
 Patients, n (%) 32 (53)
 Kaplan–Meier estimate for TTR (weeks)
  Median (95 % CI) 7.8 (7.4–8.1)
DoR
 Patients, n (%) 32 (53)
  Progressed or died due to any cause 17 (53)
  Censored, follow-up ended 4 (13)
  Censored, follow-up ongoing 11 (34)b
 Kaplan–Meier estimate for DoR (weeks)
  Median (95 % CI) 48.7 (31.7–57.1)
TTP
 Patients, n (%) 60 (100)
  Progressed or died due to breast cancer 28 (47)
  Censored, died due to other cause 2 (3)
  Censored, follow-up ended 19 (32)
  Censored, follow-up ongoing 11 (18)b
 Kaplan–Meier estimate for TTP (weeks)
  Median (95 % CI) 41.0 (39.1–64.6)

CI confidence interval, CR complete response, DoR duration of response, ITT intent-to-treat, PD progressive disease, PFS progression-free survival, PR partial response, SD stable disease, TTR time to response, TTP time to progression

aPatients who withdrew before the first response assessment. Patients with unknown responses were treated as non-responders

bAt the time of this reporting, there were 11 patients still ongoing on lapatinib monotherapy treatment