Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Burn Care Res. 2013 Jan-Feb;34(1):102–108. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3182676cc4

Table 3. Adjusted means scores of social integration and body image from adolescent and young adult burn injury survivors.

Total (n = 68) Normal Weight (n = 47) Overweight or obese (n = 21) P-value
Body Image Dissatisfaction a Crude 12.1 ± 4.4 11.8 ± 4.4 12.7 ± 4.4 0.55
Adjusted 12.4 ± 4.2 12 ± 4.3 13.1 ± 4.4 0.57
Difficulty Getting along with People b Crude 8 ± 3.3 8.4 ± 3.5 7 ± 2.5 0.21
Adjusted 7.6 ± 3.2 7.8 ± 3.5 7.0 ± 2.2 0.21
Difficulty Participating in Society c Crude 8.7 ± 4.0 8.8 ± 4.2 8.4 ± 3.7 0.7
Adjusted 8.6 ± 3.7 9 ± 4.1 7.9 ± 2.9 0.58
Difficulty in Social Integration d Crude 16.9 ± 6.6 17.5 ± 6.9 15.5 ± 5.7 0.32
Adjusted 16.4 ± 6.4 17.2 ± 6.9 14.9 ± 5.1 0.16

Adjusted for sex, age at burn, weight status at burn, well-being, amputation, head and neck burn injury, and mobility limitation.

a

Total score of the Burn Specific Heath Scale-Brief, Body Image Section. Possible score range: 0 -16.

b

Total score of the WHO-DAS II, Section 3, Domain 4. Possible score range: 5 - 25

c

Total score of the WHO-DAS II, Section 3, Domain 6. Possible score range: 5 - 25

d

Total score of the WHO-DAS II, Section 3, Domains 4 and 6. Possible score range: 10 - 50