Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 8.
Published in final edited form as: Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2012;15(Pt 3):385–392. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-33454-2_48

Table 1.

Comparison of different methods, N/A indicates that the corresponding result was not reported in the respective paper. The last three rows denote our method using intensity patch signature, discriminative (Dist) patch signature in feature space, and the discriminative (Dist) patch signature with sparse label propagation. Results obtained by our method on the last row are bolded.

Methods Mean Dice Ratio Mean ASD (mm) Mean CD (x/y/z) (mm) Median TPF
Davis et al. [1] 0.820 N/A −0.26/0.35/0.22 N/A
Feng et al. [2] 0.893 2.08 N/A N/A
Chen et al. [3] N/A 1.10 N/A 0.84

Intensity Patch 0.731 3.58 1.84/1.62/−1.74 0.72
Dist Patch 0.862 1.52 0.24/−0.23/0.31 0.84
Our Method 0.909 1.09 0.17/−0.09/0.19 0.89