Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Comput Vis Image Underst. 2013 Feb 1;117(2):145–157. doi: 10.1016/j.cviu.2012.10.006

Table 1.

Performance comparison for the three approaches on images with increasing numbers of objects. A full iteration is comprised of six iterations of level set evolution followed by reinitialization to ensure the stability of all methods. The first of these 30 iterations is reported as the iteration count for convergence. “DNC” indicates that the algorithm did not converge by the 5000th iteration. The misclassification rate counts gaps and overlaps as misclassified, and is computed after convergence.

Objects MP CLS MGDM
Convergence
(full iterations)
4 223 105 33
8 144 762 87
16 DNC 459 142
32 DNC 457 186

Memory usage
(average, MB)
4 19 21 11
8 22 29 11
16 23 46 11
32 26 78 11

Computation Time
(average per
iteration, ms)
4 54 236 51*
8 81 593 32
16 183 1143 34
32 596 2840 35

Misclassification
rate (%)
4 0.17 7.63E-4 1.91E-3
8 0.93 7.63E-4 4.20E-3
16 4.58 3.05E-3 4.65E-2
32 14.3 8.01E-3 2.06E-2