Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 8;8:39. doi: 10.1186/1746-4269-8-39

Table 2.

A description of the profiles of key respondents and their perception of the acquisition, services and practices of ethnoveterinary medicine (n=21)

S/n Description of the categories of key informants No. of respondents Percentage (%)
1.
Gender
  a
Male
18
86
  b
Female
3
14
2.
Age (yrs)
  a
50 - 59
6
29
  b
60 - 69
12
57
  c
70 - 79
3
14
3.
Education status
  a
Formal education
5
24
  b
Informal education
16
76
4.
Acquisition of EVM knowledge and experience
  a
From parents/grandparents/extended and non-extended family members
15
71
  b
From an experienced senior ethnopractitioner not related
6
29
  c
From own experience-dreams/visions
-
-
  d
Ceremonies/meetings
-
-
5.
Provision of EVM services
  a
Not charging (free)
9
43
  b
Always charging
5
24
  c
Charging under certain circumstances only
7
33
6.
Exchange of EVM knowledge amongst professionally experienced colleagues
  a
Yes
4
19
  b
No
17
81
7.
State of EVM knowledge/services/practices
  a
Falling in disfavour
5
23.8
  b
Gaining ground
10
47.6
  c Status quo 6 28.6

Key: EVM – Ethnoveterinary medicine.

N/B: The ages of key respondents were confirmed from their: - (1), birth certificates and (2), national Identity Cards (ID)/passports in Kenya.