Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Periodontal Res. 2012 Jul 19;48(1):80–86. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.2012.01506.x

Table 1.

Effect of whole BBE on metabolic activity of common oral bacteria.

Strains Range of BBE concentrations
Water 175 μg/mL 350 μg/mL 700 μg/mL 1400 μg/mL
S. oralis -3.1 (8.6) 3.6 (2.7) -0.5 (9.3) -7.9 (10.5) 8.6 (7.8)
S. gordonii 2.3 (3.6) -1.0 (10.2) -1.6 (4.5) -11.1 (13.3) -11.6 (5.1)
S. mutans 5.2 (9.6) 16.1 (5.9) 23.9 (4.0)* 31.4 (3.4)* 27.5 (1.7)*
A. naeslundii 3.3 (12.2) 6.5 (13.3) 12.9 (7.0) 11.7 (10.8) 14.0 (8.7)
A. viscosus -7.1 (7.0) 0.4 (5.2) 3.8 (4.9) -3.4 (8.1) 10.3 (7.3)
V. parvula -0.2 (2.1) -0.4 (2.4) -0.4 (2.6) -0.03 (2.6) -0.003 (2.1)
P. intermedia 0.3 (2.3) 0.1 (2.3) 0.4 (2.1) 0.2 (2.6) 0.3 (2.2)
A. actinomycetecomintans 7.6 (20.0) -7.2 (17.8) -14.2 (14.3) -19.5 (10.3) -9.6 (10.4)
P. gingivalis 1.6 (6.9) 13.8 (5.5) 27.0 (5.3)* 40.7 (2.0)* 43.6 (2.5)*
F. nucleatum 1.7 (5.7) 0.0 (7.0) 4.5 (9.4) 40.9 (18.5)* 83.5 (5.2)*
*

Data are mean percentage reductions of metabolic activity following treatment with a range of BBE concentrations. Results from at least two independent experiments performed in triplicate for each strain of bacteria. Standard deviations shown in parenthesis. Values significantly different (p ≤ 0.05) between water treatment vs. BBE extract are identified with an asterisk.

Percentage of metabolic activity inhibition for F. nucleatum and P. gingivalis exposed to 0.1% chlorhexidine for 24 h were 29.1(13.7) and 57(5.9), respectively.