Table 2.
Nominal (mM) | Measured (mM) | × 10−4 (cm·s−1) | × 10−4 (cm·s−1) | T (mN/m) | ∗ | n | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
50 | 48.5 ± 0.7 | 27 ± 5 | 26 ± 4.5 a | 1.010 ± 0.002 a | 1.38 ± 0.08 a | 2.7 ± 0.1a | 99.05 ± 0.16 | 6 |
100 | 91.0 ± 4.9 | 19 ± 1 | 19 ± 1.2 a,b | 1.014 ± 0.001 a | 1.53 ± 0.28 a | 2.8 ± 0.1a | 98.65 ± 0.11 | 3 |
150 | 137.5 ± 9.7 | 18 ± 9 | 14 ± 4.6 a,b | 1.016 ± 0.006 a,b | 1.59 ± 0.15 a | 3.1 ± 0.4a,b | 98.44 ± 0.51 | 4 |
200 | 199.4 ± 1.3 | 25 ± 5 | 14 ± 1.9 b | 1.029 ± 0.005 b | 2.04 ± 0.29 b | 4.5 ± 0.6 b | 97.82 0.48 | 5 |
The ionic force was the same in both compartments. is modified by relative pressure according to Eq. 2. was determined by the model according to Eq. 3 (Fig. 1C). Membrane tension was calculated from according to the function shown in Fig. S3 (solid dots). Different letters indicate significant differences between data within the same column (p < 0.05, Mann-Whitney test).
Internal osmolarity expressed as a percentage of the initial value.
Significant differences between data (p<0.05, Mann-Whitney test).
Significant differences between data (p<0.05, Mann-Whitney test).