Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 8;104(1):85–95. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.11.3818

Table 2.

Simulated data obtained with VPfM at 10 s in EOOs

Nominal Δosm (mM) Measured Δosm (mM) PfINI × 10−4 (cm·s−1) Pf × 10−4 (cm·s−1) Vi/V0 Pi/P0 T (mN/m) OsmiOsm0 n
50 48.5 ± 0.7 27 ± 5 26 ± 4.5 a 1.010 ± 0.002 a 1.38 ± 0.08 a 2.7 ± 0.1a 99.05 ± 0.16 6
100 91.0 ± 4.9 19 ± 1 19 ± 1.2 a,b 1.014 ± 0.001 a 1.53 ± 0.28 a 2.8 ± 0.1a 98.65 ± 0.11 3
150 137.5 ± 9.7 18 ± 9 14 ± 4.6 a,b 1.016 ± 0.006 a,b 1.59 ± 0.15 a 3.1 ± 0.4a,b 98.44 ± 0.51 4
200 199.4 ± 1.3 25 ± 5 14 ± 1.9 b 1.029 ± 0.005 b 2.04 ± 0.29 b 4.5 ± 0.6 b 97.82 0.48 5

The ionic force was the same in both compartments. Pf is modified by relative pressure (Pi/P0) according to Eq. 2. Pi/P0 was determined by the model according to Eq. 3 (Fig. 1C). Membrane tension (T) was calculated from Vi/V0 according to the function shown in Fig. S3 (solid dots). Different letters indicate significant differences between data within the same column (p < 0.05, Mann-Whitney test).

Internal osmolarity expressed as a percentage of the initial value.

a

Significant differences between data (p<0.05, Mann-Whitney test).

b

Significant differences between data (p<0.05, Mann-Whitney test).