Table 4.

Relevant EPs characterizing non-compliant decisions in the re-excision group.

Class	# EPs	Most representative EPs	Supp	GR	UR	Score
R1	4	Insitu_Microinv=Yes Menopause=Yes Sentinel_Node_Dissection=Yes	0.025	24.30	4.58	2.82
		Insitu_Microinv=Yes Menopause=Yes Axillary_Exploration=Yes	0.025	24.30	4.58	2.82
		Microinv=Yes Menopause=Yes Sentinel_Node_Dissection=Yes	0.025	24.30	4.58	2.82
		Microinv=Yes Menopause=Yes Axillary_Exploration=Yes	0.025	24.30	4.58	2.82
R2	2	Inv_Insitu=No Sentinel_Node_Dissection=Yes Inv_Margins=Pos	0.020	18.20	7.50	2.76
R3	3	Age=35–80 Insitu_Margins=Neg Neoadjuvant_Treatment=Chemo	0.025	24.30	4.00	2.46
R4	2	Age=35–80 Insitu_Margins=Neg Inv_Insitu=No Re-Excision_Mast=Yes	0.025	24.30	4.00	2.46
R5	20	Multiple_or_None=No Sentinel_Node=Neg Complete_Mam_Surg=No Insitu_Margins=Neg	0.020	18.20	6.00	2.21
		Multiple=No Sentinel_Node=Neg Complete_Mam_Surg=No Insitu_Margins=Neg	0.020	18.20	6.00	2.21
		Unique_Inv=Yes Sentinel_Node=Neg Complete_Mam_Surg=No Insitu_Margins=Neg	0.020	18.20	6.00	2.21
R6	1	Inv_Size=Greater_2cm Receptors=HR+_HER2-	0.015	12.10	10.50	1.93