Table 1.
Comparison of the classical and International Society of Urological Pathology modified Gleason grading system
Classical Gleason system (14) | 2005 ISUP modified Gleason system (15) |
---|---|
Pattern 1: Well-differentiated small, uniform, and closely packed glands in tight circumscribed masses | Pattern 1: Circumscribed nodule of closely packed, separate, uniform round-oval, medium-sized glands (generally larger than pattern 3) |
Pattern 2: Similar to pattern 1, with moderate variation in size and shape of glands and some cellular atypia; glands more loosely packed but still relatively circumscribed | Pattern 2: Similar to pattern 1, but more loosely packed glands with minimal infiltration at edges of tumor nodule and mild glandular irregularity |
Pattern 3: Very small infiltrating glands with marked irregularity of size and shape but generally retaining individual glandular differentiation; individual cells invading stroma away from circumscribed glandular masses; papillary and cribriform arrangements ranging from small to large but maintaining smooth rounded edges | Pattern 3: Small discrete glandular acini (generally smaller than patterns 1 and 2) with marked variation in size and shape and that typically infiltrate amongst nonneoplastic prostatic acini; smoothly circumscribed small cribriform glandular units |
Pattern 4: Raggedly infiltrating fused glands that coalesce and branch and are no longer single and separate; glands with large clear cells resembling hypernephroma | Pattern 4: Fused microacinar glands and ill-defined glands with poorly formed glandular lumina; large cribriform glandular units or cribriform glands with irregular borders; hypernephromatoid, ductal tumors |
Pattern 5: Infiltrative, very poorly differentiated cells arranged in solid or diffuse masses or individual cells with essentially no glandular differentiation; includes signet ring cell morphology and comedocarcinoma | Pattern 5: Tumor cells with essentially no glandular differentiation arranged in solid sheets, cords, or single cells; comedocarcinoma with central necrosis surrounded by papillary, cribriform, or solid cell masses |
Gleason scoring | |
Gleason score obtained by adding together the most prominent pattern (primary) with the second most prominent pattern (secondary) | Similar to classical, with following exceptions: Gleason scores 2–4 should rarely (if ever) be assigned to tumors on biopsies |
Same scoring method used for prostatectomy and biopsy | On biopsies, the Gleason score should be obtained by adding together the most prominent pattern (primary) with the highest remaining grade pattern (even if tertiary or <5%) |