Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 9.
Published in final edited form as: Electrophoresis. 2009 Oct;30(19):3324–3333. doi: 10.1002/elps.200900317

Figure 3.

Figure 3

EC response of CAT at three different end-channel carbon electrodes. (A) 10 µM CAT at a carbon ink electrode; (B) 1.0 µM CAT at a carbon fiber electrode; (C) 750 nM CAT at a PPF electrode. An expanded view of the baseline noise is inset for each electropherogram.