Table 4.
Analytical Parameters |
Fabrication Procedure |
Remarks |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sensitivity1 | Limit of Detection2 | Noise3 | Process | Cost | Use of Hazardous Chemicals4 |
||||
PPF End - Channel | Best | Best | Low | Simplest | Moderate | No | Requires fused silica substrate; high temperature furnace | ||
Carbon Fiber End - Channel | Good | Fair | Fair | Simple | Inexpensive | No | Requires skill to embed carbon fiber into PDMS substrate | ||
Palladium End - Channel | Good | Fair | High | Complex | Expensive | Yes | Deposition system required; use of expensive or rare metals | ||
Palladium Off - Channel | Poor | Fair | Fair | Complex | Expensive | Yes | Deposition system required; use of expensive or rare metals | ||
Carbon Ink Off - Channel | Fair | Good | Lowest | Simple | Inexpensive | Yes | Electrode size is limited by PDMS aspect ratio; thick films can be highly resistive | ||
Carbon Ink End - Channel | Poor | Fair | Lowest | Simple | Inexpensive | No | Electrode size is limited by PDMS aspect ratio; thick films can be highly resistive |
Slope of the calibration curve
Calculated for S/N=3
Based on average peak-to-peak baseline noise
Use of HF and/or aqua regia solutions