Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 25;9:93. doi: 10.1186/1743-7075-9-93

Table 3.

Diet and energy intakes, body weight, liver weight and fat content of obesity-prone and obesity-resistant rats consuming diets with different levels of resistant starch1

 
Resistant starch (RS), % of diet weight
Main Effects (P-value)
  0% 4% 8% 12% 16% RS Phenotype RS x Phenotype
Gross energy intake2,3, kJ/d
378 ± 12
364 ± 7
355 ± 12
345 ± 12
338 ± 10
0.076
0.0187
0.857
Final body weight2,4, g
485 ± 15
465 ± 12
445 ± 18
474 ± 11
461 ± 14
0.136
0.00018
0.692
Final body weight corrected2,4,5, g
483 ± 15
462 ± 12
437 ± 18
467 ± 12
449 ± 13
0.06
0.00019
0.724
Liver wt2,4, %BW
3.19 ± 0.08 c
3.15 ± 0.03 bc
3.02 ± 0.05 ab
3.04 ± 0.05 bc
2.83 ± 0.07 a
0.0001
0.126
0.056
Liver fat content6, % 6.4 ± 0.4 6.4 ± 0.3 6.3 ± 0.1 6.5 ± 0.4 6.6 ± 0.4 0.764 0.01010 0.613

1 Values are means ± SEM. Labelled means without a common letter differ, P < 0.05.

2n=8 obesity-prone and n=8 obesity-resistant rats.

3 Measured after rats were fed the RS diets for 2 wk.

4 Measured after rats were fed the RS diets for 4 wk.

5 Final body weight corrected = body weight – full caecum weight.

6 n=8 (n=4 obesity-prone and n=4 obesity-resistant rats per group).

7 Obesity-prone 368 ± 8 kJ/d, Obesity-resistant 345 ± 6 kJ/d.

8 Obesity-prone 502 ± 7 g, Obesity-resistant 445 ± 6 g.

9 Obesity-prone 497 ± 7 g, Obesity-resistant 441 ± 6 g.

10 Obesity-prone 7.0 ± 0.2%, Obesity-resistant 6.1 ± 0.2%.