Table 2.
Results of repeated-measures ANOVA among men
|
MEN |
|
|
|
|
|
Model 1 |
Model 2 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 6-year follow-up | Results of | Results of | ||||||
|
Cohort 1946–1950 (n = 278) |
|
Mean |
SE |
Mean |
SE |
ANOVA |
|
ANOVA |
|
| Education |
Elementary school (69%) |
12,6 |
3,5 |
12,6 |
3,5 |
Within Subjects |
|
Within Subjects |
|
| |
Middle school (18%) |
12,4 |
3,5 |
13,0 |
4,0 |
Phys. Capacity |
p=0.012 |
Phys. Capacity |
p=0.003 |
| |
Secondary school (13%) |
11,5 |
2,2 |
13,2 |
4,3 |
Between Subjects |
Between Subjects |
||
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Education |
p=0.888 |
Education |
p=0.771 |
| Adequacy of income |
Good (62%) |
11,7 |
2,6 |
12,2 |
3,2 |
Within Subjects |
|
Within Subjects |
|
| |
Fair or poor (38%) |
13,5 |
4,2 |
13,5 |
4,3 |
Phys. Capacity |
p=0.214 |
Phys. Capacity |
p=0.292 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Between Subjects |
Between Subjects |
||
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Adeq. Of income |
p<0.001 |
Adeq. Of income |
p<0.001 |
|
Cohort 1936–1940 (n = 350) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Education |
Elementary school (80%) |
13,8 |
4,1 |
14,1 |
4,4 |
Within Subjects |
|
Within Subjects |
|
| |
Middle school (13%) |
13,8 |
4,0 |
13,5 |
3,5 |
Phys. Capacity |
p=0.497 |
Phys. Capacity |
p=0.788 |
| |
Secondary school (7%) |
11,9 |
2,6 |
12,5 |
4,1 |
Between Subjects |
Between Subjects |
||
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Education |
p=0.075 |
Education |
p=0.375 |
| Adequacy of income |
Good (64%) |
13,1 |
3,5 |
13,5 |
4,0 |
Within Subjects |
|
Within Subjects |
|
| |
Fair or poor (36%) |
14,8 |
4,7 |
14,7 |
4,6 |
Phys. Capacity |
p=0.190 |
Phys. Capacity |
p=0.658 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Between Subjects |
Between Subjects |
||
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Adeq. Of income |
p=0.001 |
Adeq. Of income |
p=0.004 |
|
Cohort 1926–1930 (n = 221) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Education |
Elementary school (81%) |
15,7 |
4,8 |
16,8 |
4,8 |
Within Subjects |
|
Within Subjects |
|
| |
Middle school (9%) |
13,8 |
4,1 |
14,6 |
4,9 |
Phys. Capacity |
p=0.662 |
Phys. Capacity |
p=0.372 |
| |
Secondary school (10%) |
14,8 |
4,9 |
15,1 |
4,5 |
Between Subjects |
Between Subjects |
||
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Education |
p=0.080 |
Education |
p=0.129 |
| Adequacy of income |
Good (58%) |
15,0 |
4,6 |
15,9 |
4,8 |
Within Subjects |
|
Within Subjects |
|
| |
Fair or poor (42%) |
16,0 |
5,0 |
17,1 |
4,9 |
Phys. Capacity |
p=0.762 |
Phys. Capacity |
p=0.279 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Between Subjects |
Between Subjects |
||
| Adeq. Of income | p=0.074 | Adeq. Of income | p=0.283 | ||||||
Model 1: Sociodemographic measure.
Model 2: Sociodemographic measure+ smoking status, physical activity, consumption of fruits and vegetables, alcohol consumption.