Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 18;12:36. doi: 10.1186/1471-2490-12-36

Table 3.

Comparison of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy on the outcome of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

References Period of NHT* (months) No. of patients Transfusion rate (%) PSM** rate (%) BCR*** rate after 2 years (%)
Rassweiler et al. [14]
 NHT group
NA
42
46.0
NA
NA
 non-NHT group
-
138
NA
NA
NA
Gregori et al. [15]
 NHT group
less than 3
21
NA
NA
NA
 non-NHT group
-
59
NA
NA
NA
Brown et al. [7]
 NHT group
less than 3
5
0
0
NA
 non-NHT group
-
60
1.7
17.0
NA
Maldonado-Valadez et al. [16]
 NHT group
3.5
50
36.0
18.0
NA
 non-NHT group
-
50
52.0
16.0
NA
Pu et al. [6]
 NHT group
3
25
32.0
12.0
NA
 
8
19
31.2
10.5
NA
 non-NHT group
-
11
36.4
45.5
NA
Our series
 NHT group
3 or less
47
2.12
27.7
27.7
 
more than 3
25
4.00
28.0
4.00
 non-NHT group - 270 1.48 42.2 17.8

Reviews of the impact of NHT prior to LRP on operative and postoperative parameters.

NHT*: neoadjuvant hormonal therapy PSM**: positive surgical margin BCR***: biochemical recurrence.

NA: not available PSM: positive surgical margin BCR: biochemical recurrence.