Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 10;3:606. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00606

Table 1.

Correlation results with their 95% CIs for the Anscombe’s quartet.

Pair 1 Pair 2 Pair 3 Pair 4
Pearson r = 0.81, p = 0.002 r = 0.81, p = 0.002 r = 0.81, p = 0.002 r = 0.81, p = 0.002
h = 1, CI [0.59, 0.95] h = 1, CI [0.48, 0.96] h = 1, CI [0.71, 1] h = 1, CI [0.75, 0.95]
Spearman r = 0.81, p = 0.002 r = 0.69, p = 0.01 r = 0.99, p ∼ 0 r = 0.5, p = 0.1
h = 1, CI [0.49, 0.97] h = 0, CI [−0.009, 1] h = 1, CI [0.99, 1] h = 1, CI [0.5, 0.8]
20% bend r = 0.81, p = 0.002 r = 0.8, p = 0.0029 r = 1, p = 0 r = 0.22, p = 0.49
h = 1, CI [0.43, 0.96] h = 0, CI [−0.06, 0.99] h = 1, CI [0.89, 1] h = 1, CI [0.2, 0.79]
Skipped Pearson r = 0.81, h = 1 r = 0.81, h = 1 r = 0.81, h = 1 r = NaN, h = 0
h = 1, CI [0.54, 0.95] h = 1, CI [0.51, 0.96] h = 1, CI [0.74, 1] h = 0, CI [NaN NaN]
Skipped Spearman r = 0.81, h = 1 r = 0.69, h = 0 r = 0.99, h = 1 r = NaN, h = 0
h = 1, CI [0.4, 0.97] h = 1, CI [0, 1] h = 1, CI [0.9, 1] h = 0, CI [NaN NaN]