Table 3.
CVp | Pt | ‘Climatic Composite’ | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
log(Ranget) | log(Rangep) | Pp | CVt | |||
‘Mimicry syndrome’ c | ||||||
Tandem repetition | −0.006 | −0.367* | 0.608** | −0.338 | −0.422** | 0.466** |
Switching Rate | 0.045 | 0.263 | −0.456** | 0.211 | 0.423** | −0.337* |
‘Short-term diversity’ c | ||||||
Types per Sample | −0.249 | 0.024 | 0.141 | −0.137 | −0.180 | 0.434** |
Syllable Versatility | −0.285 | 0.146 | −0.275 | 0.11 | 0.103 | −0.002 |
Song Rate | −0.170 | −0.169 | 0.697** | −0.53** | −0.575** | 0.626*** |
Syllable Consistency | 0.404** | −0.337* | 0.059 | −0.116 | 0.027 | −0.197 |
‘Song complexity’ d | ||||||
Song Duration | 0.248 | 0.067 | 0.188 | −0.124 | −0.11 | 0.172 |
Syllable Duration | −0.364* | −0.496** | −0.235 | 0.05 | 0.253 | −0.157 |
Syllable Types per Song | −0.013 | 0.077 | 0.285 | −0.276 | −0.247 | 0.421** |
CV = coefficient of variation; P = Colwell's predictability index; Range = range of variation; Subscript p = precipitation; Subscript t = temperature
* p<0.08, ** p<0.05, *** p<0.001
Correlations based on phylogenetically independent contrasts [44] given strong evidence for a phylogenetic signal (df = 26)
Correlations based on raw measurements given low evidence of a phylogenetic signal (df = 27)