Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 9;88(1):178–183. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2012.12-0232

Table 2.

Seroprevalence and presumptive serogroups of symptomatic and asymptomatic dogs collected in three human leptospirosis high-risk neighborhoods of Barranquilla*

Neighborhood MAT ≥ 1:100 Serogroup (titer) Symptomatic = S
Serogroup-reactive/total (%)
Las Américas 4/26 (15.4%) Fainei (1:1,600) S
Tarassovi (1:100) S
Tarassovi (1:200) S
Tarassovi (1:800) S
Por Fin 3/30 (10.0%) Louisiana (1:400) S
Autumnalis (1:1,600) S
Autumnalis/Fainei (1:1,400)
Rebolo 12/27 (44.4%) Icterohaemorrhagiae (1:100) S
Icterohaemorrhagiae (1:200) S
Icterohaemorrhagiae (1:400) S
Icterohaemorrhagiae (1:800) SPCR
Louisiana (1:800)
Louisiana (1:6,400) S
Louisiana (1:25,000) S
Tarassovi (1:100) S
Canicola (1:800)
Fainei (1:3,200) S
Grippotyphosa (1:800)
Icterohaemorrhagiae/Grippotyphosa/Sarmin (1:400) S
Positive/Total 19/83 (22.9%) Symptomatic/asymptomatic: 15/19 (78.9%)
*

Eighty-three dogs collected from three human leptospirosis high-risk neighborhoods (Las Américas, Por Fin, and Rebolo) of Barranquilla were assessed for signs and symptoms of canine leptospirosis (S = symptomatic), and their highest microscopic agglutination test (MAT) titers were determined against a panel of 20 different pathogenic Leptospira serogroups. The highest MAT titers obtained against one or more serogroups are shown.PCR Urine PCR positive.