Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec;106(8):488–496. doi: 10.1179/2047773212Y.0000000056

Table 2. Major container types and numbers with pupae found during the wet season base line survey (November–December 2009) in Chennai.

Intervention Control
Type of container Total number of container Proportion to total containers Container positive Proportion to container+ve to total No. of pupae in positive container % of all pupae Total number of containers Proportion to total containers Container positive Proportion of container+ve to total No. of pupae in positive container % of all pupae
Cement tank* 73 0.021 19 0.062 366 7.34 58 0.019 22 0.099 431 13.14
Coconut shells 14 0.004 5 0.016 89 1.79 6 0.002 5 0.023 52 1.58
Disused container 156 0.045 87 0.282 1342 26.92 58 0.020 41 0.185 691 21.06
Flower vases 25 0.007 16 0.052 329 6.59 16 0.005 7 0.031 130 3.96
Grinding stone 55 0.016 31 0.101 514 10.31 41 0.014 32 0.144 692 21.09
Plastic/metal drum 260 0.076 63 0.205 1222 24.51 193 0.066 36 0.162 558 17.00
Plastic pot 1434 0.417 17 0.055 205 4.11 1168 0.397 13 0.595 53 1.62
Tyres 24 0.007 21 0.068 279 5.60 14 0.005 13 0.595 166 5.06
Miscellaneous† 1396 0.406 49 0.159 639 12.82 1387 0.472 53 0.239 508 15.48
Total (including all containers 3437 308 4985 2941 222 3281

Notes: *Cement tanks, which were the predominant producers of Aedes pupae, had lost their relative importance after the Corporation (public sector) had treated them with temephos, just before our survey in the wet season.

†Miscellaneous containers recorded were ceramic jar, bowl, bucket, metal containers, mud pot, refrigerator trays, and tree holes.