Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 10;7(1):e1992. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001992

Table 1. Sensitivity of rK39 RDT and CLA ELISA in samples from infected and uninfected dogs.

n (N) CLA ELISA rK39 RDT
% (95% CI) % (95% CI)
Infected dogs 285 (54) 85.3 (80.4–89.1) 45.6 (36.8–54.7)
Uninfected endemic dogs 29 (28) - 0
Brazil non-endemic dogs 8 (8) - 0
UK non-endemic dogs 30 (30) - 0
Infected dogs by serological status1
- seropositive 243 (54) - 52.2 (42.1–62.0)
- seronegative 42 (32) - 0
Infected dogs by PCR status
- PCR positive 111 (45) 91.8 (85.0–95.6) 58.6 (47.8–68.7)
- PCR negative 74 (30) 67.7 (53.5–79.3) 26.3 (14.7–42.6)
Infected dogs by clinical status
- Symptomatic 99 (39) 95.3 (83.9–98.8) 76.5 (63.8–85.7)
- Polysymptomatic 39 (25) 97.4 (82.6–99.7) 88.9 (70.2–96.5)
- Oligosymptomatic 60 (30) 93.4 (79.7–98.1) 69.1 (52.5–81.9)
- Asymptomatic 178 (51) 81.3 (75.0–86.4) 32.6 (23.9–42.7)
Infected dogs by xenodiagnosis
- Infectious 35 (18) 100 77.7 (59.0–89.4)
- Non-infectious 81 (27) 80.6 (69.0–88.5) 46.6 (32.0–61.8)

The percentage of dogs positive (95% CI) by each test for different classes of dogs was estimated using general estimating equations with robust standard errors, to account for the non-independence of repeat samples from the same dog. n – number of samples; N – number of dogs.

1

as defined by CLA ELISA.