Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 10;8(1):e52673. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052673

Table 2. Major differences in substrates giving dye reduction between spoligotypes of M .bovis and within spoligotypes of M .bovis.

Between M. bovis spoligotypes Within spoligotypes
PM1 plate 9 vs 17 17 vs 35 9 vs 35
A03 N-ac-D-Glucosamine 9b>17c 9b>35a 9b>9c
B03 Glycerol 9>17 9b>17c 35a>17 9b>9a = 9c
C09 D-Glucose 9b>35a
E05 Tween 80 9b>9a
G09 monomethylsuccinate 17>35a 17c>35a 9>35a 9b>35a
G10 methylpyruvate 9>35a 9b>35a
PM2A plate
D06 D-Tagatose 9b>9a
E02 Caproic acid 35a>17 35a>17c
PM3B plate
B10 L-Serine 17c>17b
E08 D-Glucosamine 17c>17b

All differences were significant at P<0.05. There was at least a 5-fold difference in dye reduction (Omnilog units) between the strains. Dye reduction was >10 Omnilog units for the strain with the highest value. Differences were tested between spoligotypes by (i) comparing pooled dye reduction data for all strains tested and (ii) comparing data from the most used strains: 9b, 17c and 35a. Note that 35a was the only representative of spoligotype 35. Given that there are ten pairwise differences, these data are shown in a table rather than heatmaps.