Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Biotechnol. 2012 Sep 3;164(2):188–195. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2012.08.008

Table 3.

Kinetic parameters of LlAdhA variants on related aldehydes.

Aldehydes Structure LlAdhA LlAdhARE1 LlAdhA29C8

KM
[mM]
kcat
[s−1]
kcat/KM
[mM−1s−1]
KM
[mM]
kcat
[s−1]
kcat/KM
[mM−1s−1]
KM
[mM]
kcat
[s−1]
kcat/KM
[mM−1s−1]
Isobutyraldehyde graphic file with name nihms405119t1.jpg 12 30 2.8 1.70 140 82 0.68 300 440
Acetaldehyde graphic file with name nihms405119t2.jpg 0.4 35 94 0.5 31 57 0.92 58 63
5-HMF graphic file with name nihms405119t3.jpg 22 19 0.88 0.67 23 34 0.57 29 51
2-Furaldehyde graphic file with name nihms405119t4.jpg 0.39 22 57 0.26 6.0 21 0.20 7 37
Cinnamaldehyde graphic file with name nihms405119t5.jpg 0.7 27 39 0.24 28 140 0.16 31 210

All enzymes were purified prior to characterization. Errors are reported as standard deviations determined from a minimum of three independent experiments. The resulting standard errors are shown in Table S3, Supplemental Information. The enzyme assays were conducted in 100 mM Tris pH 7 with 1 mM DTT, 200 µM NADH, and 10 mM substrate. Concentrations of the purified enzymes were determined using the Bradford assay. The Michaelis-Menten constants for the substrate were measured with appropriate dilution series of isobutyraldehyde. Enzyme assays were performed at 25°C.