Table 2.
Comparison | C. esculenta var. GP | Wolffiella lingulata | Wolffia australiana | Lemna minor | Spirodela polyrhiza |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Repeats and substitutions | |||||
Correlation between repeats and substitutions (r) | 0.245 | 0.391 | 0.416 | 0.424 | 0.491 |
Significance of correlation (t) | 6.44*** | 10.81*** | 11.657*** | 11.92*** | 14.37*** |
Coefficient of determination (r2) | 0.060 | 0.152 | 0.173 | 0.180 | 0.241 |
Insertion–deletions (indels) and substitutions | |||||
Correlation between indels and substitutions (r) | 0.391 | 0.220 | 0.245 | 0.323 | 0.387 |
Significance of correlation (t) | 10.82*** | 5.75*** | 6.43*** | 8.71*** | 10.69*** |
Coefficient of determination (r2) | 0.153 | 0.048 | 0.060 | 0.105 | 0.150 |
Repeats and indels | |||||
Correlation between repeats and indels (r) | 0.640 | 0.168 | 0.178 | 0.224 | 0.212 |
Significance of correlation (t) | 21.20*** | 4.33*** | 4.59*** | 5.87*** | 5.51*** |
Coefficient of determination (r2) | 0.409 | 0.028 | 0.032 | 0.050 | 0.045 |
Note.—The alignments compared closely related (var. RR to var. GP) and distantly related (var. RR to W. lingulata, W. australiana, L. minor, and S. polyrhiza) aroid chloroplast genomes. The alignments were partitioned into 651 nonoverlapping bins of 250 bp size each to calculate these correlations.
***All correlations were highly significant at 0.001α and 649 degree of freedom.