Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 11.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2012;41(2):177–188. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2012.651996

Table 3.

Mediation of the Effect of the FBP on Effective Parenting Six Years Later: Testing five plausible mediating variables

Mediation Parametersb
a
b
c
Putative Mediatora B(SE) t p B(SE) t p B(SE) t p
Effective Parenting (W2/3) −.20(.06) 3.34 .001 .46(.11) 4.17 .001 .12(.11) 1.12 ns
Caregiver Mental Health (W2/3) −.15(.11) −1.41 ns −.05(.08) −.65 ns .23(.12) 2.21 .03
Negative Life Events (W2) −.25(.12) −2.08 .04 −.05(.06) −.73 ns .22(.11) 2.12 .04
Externalizing Problems (W3, Youth-report) −.38(.17) −2.27 .03 −.05(.05) −.98 ns .21(.11) 1.92 .06
Externalizing Problems (W3, Caregiver-report) −.06(.17) .34 ns .01(.06) .18 ns .22(.11) 2.02 .05
a

Mediational analyses conducted separately

b

The ‘a’path represents the effect of the intervention on the mediator, controlling for pretest youth mental health, pretest assessment of the mediator and group assignment; the ‘b’ path reflects the effect of the mediator on effective parenting at six years controlling for pretest youth mental health, pretest effective parenting, and group assignment; the ‘c’ path represents the effect of the intervention on effective parenting at six years controlling for pretest youth mental health, pretest effective parenting, and the mediator.