Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 27;137(24):244901. doi: 10.1063/1.4772402

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Spatial dependence of the density and relaxation of films. (a) Representative monomer density profile of ρ(z) for a supported film on an attractive surface for a range of T for film thickness hg = 15.03, corresponding to about 30 nm in physical polymer units. It is apparent from ρ(z, T) that the thickness of the film decreases on cooling. The inset shows the density profile of monomers for various thicknesses scaled by the bulk value. We see that the peaks are independent of film thickness and that there is a bulk-like region far from the interfaces. (b) Relaxation time τs as function of distance z from the wall for various T for hg = 15.03. τs(z) is altered from the bulk, even near the center of the film where the density is the same as the bulk. The deviation of τs from the bulk becomes more significant at low temperature.