Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013 Jan;45(1):157–162. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31826c9a78

Table 2.

Mean Strength Values (n = 419)

Test Type Total Men
(N=205)
Women
(N=214)
p Value*
Handgrip
      Handgrip 37 (9%) 47 (6%) 29 (8%) <0.01
Elbow
      Isometric
      Extension
      APT
40 (12%) 56 (8%) 29 (8%) <0.01
      Isometric
      Flexion APT
48 (11%) 66 (6%) 35 (8%) <0.01
      Isokinetic
      Extension
      60°/sec APT
37 (11%) 49 (6%) 27 (8%) <0.01
      Isokinetic
      Flexion
      60°/sec APT
32 (12%) 46 (6%) 22 (7%) <0.01
      Isokinetic
      Extension
      180°/sec APT
30 (12%) 41 (8%) 22 (9%) <0.01
      Isokinetic
      Flexion
      180°/sec APT
28 (11%) 39 (6%) 21 (7%) <0.01
Knee
      Isometric
      Extension
      APT
178 (8%) 227 (6%) 141 (7%) <0.01
      Isometric
      Flexion APT
77 (9%) 99 (6%) 60 (8%) <0.01
      Isokinetic
      Extension
      60°/sec APT
137 (8%) 177 (5%) 107 (6%) <0.01
      Isokinetic
      Flexion
      60°/sec APT
70 (10%) 93 (6%) 53 (9%) <0.01
      Isokinetic
      Extension
      180°/sec APT
92 (9%) 121 (6%) 71 (7%) <0.01
      Isokinetic
      Flexion
      180°/sec APT
49 (11%) 67 (7%) 37 (10%) <0.01

Strength values are represented by average peak torque (APT) in Newton-meters (Nm) and presented as geometric mean (coefficient of variation %)

*

for gender difference

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure