Table 3. Comparison and synergetic value of the mini-chip and CT for lung cancer diagnosis.
| Mini-chip* | CT | Combined CT and mini-chip | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Sensitivity | Specificity | Accuracy | Sensitivity | Specificity | Accuracy | Sensitivity | Specificity | Accuracy | |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| All tumors | 70% | 92% | 84% | 85% | 89% | 86% | 91% | 92% | 90% |
| Central tumors | 73% | 98% | 93% | 79% | 90% | 87% | 86% | 96% | 94% |
| Peripheral tumors | 64% | 96% | 87% | 93% | 98% | 97% | 89% | 95% | 92% |
*
The sensitivity and specificity of combining all the genetic aberrations were obtained by using ROC and their AUROC analysis.