Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 14;11:67. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-11-67

Table 3.

The association of fair/poor self-rated health with social structure, behavioral/attitudinal and psychosocial variables among women a, b

Variable/category
    Model 1
    Model 2
Model 3 (Final Model: n=2310, valid n=1606)
  OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
Age (years)
1.06
1.05–1.07
1.06
1.05–1.06
1.05
1.04–1.06
Employment
0.60
0.47–0.76
0.70
0.54–0.91
0.72
0.53–0.99
Education
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Less than school (<10 years)
1.30
0.85–1.98
0.82
0.52–1.28
0.60
0.34–1.05
 Secondary (10–13 years)
1.53
1.21–1.94
1.18
0.92–1.53
1.21
0.90–1.64
 University or more (ref.)
1.00
 
1.00
 
1.00
 
Poverty
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Severe
2.16
1.70–2.74
1.82
1.41–2.34
1.40
1.01–1.94
 Moderate
1.30
1.05–1.62
1.17
0.93–1.46
1.16
0.88–1.53
 No poverty (ref.)
1.00
 
1.00
 
1.00
 
Low affordability of healthcare
2.49
1.82–3.41
2.14
1.55–2.95
1.95
1.28–2.98
Depression
3.36
2.66–4.25
 
 
2.75
2.14–3.53
Weak social support
2.30
1.80–2.94
 
 
1.90
1.42–2.56
Positive toward healthy lifestyle
0.90
0.74–1.08
 
 
 
 
Hosmer& Lemeshow goodness of fit test
p=0.390
Area under ROC curve
0.780
Pseudo R2 0.179

a Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

b Model 1: controlled for age. Model 2: controlled for significant variables in social structure (age, employment, education, poverty, low affordability of healthcare). Model 3: controlled for significant variables in all three dimensions. Final Model: fitted model.