Table 5.
Distribution of facilities across socioeconomic status (SES) quintiles, by facility type, province, and distance from main town
|
Categories |
Total |
SES Quintiles2 |
P-value3 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Poorest 20% |
2ndquintile |
3rdquintile |
4thquintile |
Least poor 20% |
||||
|
N=248 |
n=68 |
n=65 |
n=30 |
n=38 |
n=47 |
|||
| % |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|||
| |
[95% CI] |
[95% CI] |
[95% CI] |
[95% CI] |
[95% CI] |
|||
| All facilities % | 100 | 20.4 | 20.3 | 20.3 | 20.9 | 18.2 | ||
| Facility type |
Dispensaries |
100 |
21.0 |
17.8 |
21.9 |
20.5 |
18.9 |
P = 0.16 |
| n=165 |
[11.1-36.2] |
[10.8-27.8] |
[12.8-34.8] |
[9.9-37.8] |
[10.8-30.8] |
|||
| Health centers |
100 |
17.2 |
33.0 |
12.0 |
23.0 |
14.9 |
||
| n=83 |
[8.3-32.2] |
[15.1-57.6] |
[6.1-22.4] |
[6.7-55.3] |
[7.5-27.2] |
|||
| Province |
Central |
100 |
0 |
7.9 |
0 |
7.4 |
84.7 |
P<0.01** |
| n=33 |
|
[1.0-41.1] |
|
[1.3-31.8] |
[42.0-97.7] |
|||
| Coast |
100 |
48.2 |
15.3 |
12.6 |
19.9 |
4.1 |
||
| n=28 |
[13.2-85.1] |
[6.4-32.0] |
[3.1-39.6] |
[3.0-66.5] |
[0.5-27.5] |
|||
| Eastern |
100 |
37.4 |
17.9 |
21.5 |
10.4 |
12.7 |
||
| n=33 |
[10.5-75.2] |
[13.0-24.1] |
[10.7-38.5] |
[4.4-22.8] |
[2.7-43.1] |
|||
| North Eastern |
100 |
64.9 |
32.0 |
0 |
0 |
3.0 |
||
| n=25 |
[18.2-93.9] |
[6.3-76.6] |
|
|
[0.4-19.3] |
|||
| Nyanza |
100 |
27.1 |
8.9 |
38.3 |
25.7 |
0 |
||
| n=25 |
[2.5-84.5] |
[0.6-60.9] |
[9.7-78.1] |
[7.2-60.6] |
|
|||
| Rift Valley |
100 |
1.3 |
20.9 |
27.9 |
35.4 |
14.6 |
||
| n=32 |
[0.1-12.7] |
[5.6-54.0] |
[14.3-47.1] |
[12.0-68.7] |
[5.6-33.1] |
|||
| Western |
100 |
33.9 |
51.6 |
8.4 |
6.2 |
0 |
||
| n=33 |
[14.7-60.3] |
[18.4-83.4] |
[1.7-33.0] |
[1.2-26.9] |
|
|||
| Municipal1 |
100 |
25.7 |
12.9 |
10.0 |
16.3 |
35.1 |
||
| n=39 |
[5.4-67.8] |
[5.0-29.3] |
[2.7-31.2] |
[5.2-40.8] |
[6.6-80.6] |
|||
| Remoteness | Near |
100 |
19.8 |
20.7 |
17.4 |
16.6 |
25.5 |
P=0.50 |
| n=80 |
[7.6-42.7] |
[11.8-33.8] |
[7.1-36.6] |
[7.5-32.6] |
[16.4-37.3] |
|||
| Average |
100 |
24.3 |
18.6 |
17.7 |
25.5 |
13.8 |
||
| n=140 |
[13.9-38.9] |
[7.0-41.3] |
[10.6-28.0] |
[7.1-60.4] |
[6.1-28.6] |
|||
| Far |
100 | 7.9 |
25.0 |
32.9 |
11.9 |
22.3 |
||
| n=28 | [1.9-28.0] | [11.4-46.2] | [14.1-59.4] | [0.8-68.7] | [8.6-46.7] | |||
1 Municipal areas included districts of Kilindini (Coast province), Nairobi West (Nairobi province), and Kisumu East (Nyanza province).
2 Weighted row percentage shown across SES quintiles. For example of dispensaries surveyed, 21.0% were in the poorest quintile of all facilities surveyed, and 18.9% were in the least poor quintile of facilities surveyed. The number of facilities per quintile is not equal as sampling weights are used in calculating the quintile cut-offs
3 Difference across groups tested using chi-squared test; *=p<0.05; **=p<0.01.