Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 14;8(1):e53878. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053878

Table 3. Comparison with other studies about methane flux from wetlands on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau reported with the static chamber method.

Location Vegetation Methane flux (mg CH4m-2 h-1 ) Study period Reference
In Zoige County K. tibetica 5.49±5.29 Jun. to Sept.2005 to 2007 This study
(33°56′N,102°52′E, a.s.l. 3430 m) C. muliensis 17.78±17.50
E. valleculosa 13.35±12.27
In the Huashixia Region Carex meadow 0.41±0.79 Apr. to Sept.1997 [15]
(35°39′N, 98°48′E, a.s.l. 4300–4500 m) Caltha scaposa ±0.28
Hippuris vulgaris 1.46±2.30
C. atrofusaskr 3.00±4.25
In Hongyuan County C. muliensis 2.87 (0.51-8.20) May to Sept.2001 [16]
(32°47′N, 102°32′E, a.s.l. 3470 m) C. meyeriana 4.51 (0.36-10.04)
In the Lanhaizhi wetland Potamogeton 1.38 Jul. to Sept.2002 [13]
(37°29′N, 101°12′E, a.s.l. 3250 m) Hippuris 8.92
Scirpus 4.57
Carex 8.19
In Haibei Carex meadow 0.80–1.41 Jun. to Sept.2003
(37°37′N, 101°19′E, a.s.l. 3280 m) Carex and Hippuris 2.91–16.25
In Zoige County (littoral wetlands) K. tibetica -0.1–26.3 Jun. to Aug.2005 and 2006 [10]
(33°56′N,102°52′E, a.s.l. 3430 m) C. muliensis -0.1–21.8
Non-vegetated 0.1–3.8
H. vulgaris 0.2–22.9
P. amphibium 0.4–40.4
G. maxima 12–90