Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun 13;108(5):1335–1348. doi: 10.1152/jn.00972.2011

Table 1.

Experiment 1 ANOVA results for condition by time interaction and follow-up t-tests

Epoch, ms
0–100
100–200
200–300
300–400
400–500
500–600
600–700
700–800
Location of Channel Groups F-Value F(7,77) P t P t P t P t P t P t P t P t P
Midline prefrontal 4.52 0.009 −0.17 0.86 0.79 0.44 −0.33 0.75 −1.56 0.15 3.60 0.004 4.57 8E-04 0.004 0.99 −2.29 0.04
Left frontal 4.84 0.003 0.72 0.49 2.03 0.07 0.05 0.96 −1.90 0.08 2.13 0.06 0.94 0.37 −2.97 0.01 −3.69 0.004
Midline frontal 2.46 0.070
Right frontal 6.80 4E-04 1.31 0.22 2.70 0.02 −0.16 0.87 −2.50 0.03 1.82 0.10 2.61 0.02 −1.81 0.10 −4.26 0.001
Left central 5.52 0.002 −0.10 0.93 −1.27 0.23 0.61 0.55 4.66 7E-04 0.43 0.68 −3.73 0.003 −1.20 0.26 −0.32 0.76
Midline central 5.10 0.008 −1.14 0.28 −1.02 0.33 2.85 0.02 2.91 0.01 −2.23 0.05 −2.05 0.07 0.66 0.52 0.10 0.92
Right central 0.40 0.765
Left parietal 4.94 0.003 −0.76 0.46 −3.09 0.01 −1.08 0.30 1.72 0.11 0.53 0.61 −1.50 0.16 2.63 0.02 5.63 2.E-04
Midline parietal 4.97 0.005 −0.51 0.62 −3.10 0.01 −1.45 0.17 1.63 0.13 −1.78 0.10 −0.72 0.49 2.56 0.03 3.49 0.005
Right parietal 2.23 0.095
Left temporal 1.20 0.330
Right temporal 1.20 0.320
Midline occipital 2.14 0.120

Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA (8 time bins × 2 transitions) was performed. Corresponding F values and Greenhouse-Geisser-corrected P values are shown. Each significant interaction was followed up with individual t-tests and considered significant with a Bonferroni-corrected P value <0.00625. Corresponding t-values and P values are shown. Regions of interest (ROIs) with significant interactions followed by significant t-tests are highlighted in bold. Significant P values are highlighted in bold.